Dawes 2008 noted, that both simulation and empirical studies have concurred that reliability and validity improved by using 5 to 7point scales. Likerttype scales in relation to reliability and validity lei chang university of central florida reliability and validity of 4point and 6point scales were assessed using a new modelbased approach to fit empirical data. Moreover, each factor must have more than two variables. Reliability and validity are two very important qualities of a questionnaire. The reliability of th e questionnaire was reported 0. Likert scale, the nonlikert scale 0,1,2,3 may present a more logical alternative. However, there is a debate among researchers concerning the optimum number of choices in a likerttype scale. The japanese version of the postpartum bonding questionnaire.
The aim of the present work is to determine in a systematic fashion the number of response alternatives that maximizes the fundamental psychometric properties of a scale. In particular, we aim to provide data regarding interitem correlations, means, standard deviations, va. If the final scale is intemally consistent, it is a reliable scale. Reliability and validity of 4point and 6point scales were assessed using a new modelbased approach to fit empirical data. The data were collected by means of a questionnaire scale on teachers perception of teaching a competencebased curriculum model. Validity test showed that non likert scale was 93% reliable. The results of this study demonstrated the reliability and validity of the pbq and the pbq14 with japanese mothers 4 weeks after delivery. Respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the items, using a fivepoint likerttype scale. Reliability and validity of the brief dimensional apathy scale.
Use and misuse of the likert item responses and other. For example, each of the five or seven responses would have a numerical value which would be used to measure the attitude under investigation. The reliability and validity of the outcome rating scale. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on primary and. Testing the validity and reliability of the levels of self. Many studies have also compared vas and likert scales with regard to reliability andor validity andor user friendliness andor responsi veness in different settings 15, 1 6, 21, 22, 27, 30, 32, 33, 35 49. Scale development remains a growth industry within psychology. Thus in measurement, the two very important concepts are reliability how consistent the outcome of the tool is, and validity showing how well the. It consists of 26 items, each followed by a fourpoint likert scale ranging from almost always 4 to almost never 1. The second and likert type scales have widespread and frequent main psychometric property of a scale is validity. Assesing validity and reliiability of likert and visual. A psychometric evaluation of 4point and 6point likert. The 22 items are assessed on a 5point likert scale, ranging from 0 never to 4 nearly always. The 12item quickfaam is scored on a 5point likert scale were scores are converted to a percentage 0100%, and greater scores indicate greater function.
The structured questionnaire consisted of 31 closeended items. Likert scales are comparable with regard to reliability and validity and yield similar results 15, 33, 47. Use and misuse of the likert item responses and other ordinal. Reliability and validity of job satisfaction survey. We wanted to examine the validity of likert versions of this scale to enable comparison of spq symptoms with normal personality traits measured in a likert format and to disguise the unusualness of spd symptoms by both allowing partial endorsement of items and by intermixing them with more normal and potentially more socially desirable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of an existing popular used instrument of selfconcept, which is named lscs in the context of chinese culture. Likert scale definition, examples and analysis simply.
Validity and reliability of the likert scale psychology essay. Reliability and validity of two likert versions of the. Empirical evidence shows that non likert scale 0,1,2,3 is 92% reliable while the likert type of scale had 90, 89, and 88% reliability. A psychometric evaluation of 4point and 6point likerttype. The problems involved in assessing the validity and reliability of such scores are several magnitudes more difficult than for assessing. A complete and adequate assessment of validity must include both theoretical and empirical approaches. Reliability and validity of the turkish version of the. The purpose of this study was to examine reliability and validity indexes for the mdes in a sample of greek citizens. On several indices of reliability, validity, and discriminating power, the twopoint, threepoint, and fourpoint scales performed relatively poorly, and indices were signi. The article presents the development of the psychological flexibility questionnaire pfq on the basis of two studies. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbachs alpha. Continued validation and known groups validity of the. Validity is, therefore, the most fundamental consideration in developing and evaluating tests.
The questionnaire was sent online to every school in spain 17,747 at the time of data collection. Reliability and validity of the modified differential. The descriptive survey research method has been used in the study. Reliability and validity of the multidimensional locus of. Jul 01, 2015 likert, and likerttype, responses are popular psychometric item scoring schemes for attempting to quantify peoples opinions on different issues. The issue in likert scale is the scale reliability.
Background likert type scales are increasingly being used among people with intellectual disability id. Different measurement models were fit by confirmatory factor analyses of a multitraitmultimethod covariance matrix. Many studies have also compared vas and likert scales with regard to reliability and or validity and or user friendliness and or responsi veness in different settings 15, 1 6, 21, 22, 27, 30, 32, 33, 35 49. Even the more straightforward concept of reliability is widely mistreated, as we discuss in a later section. The intemal consistency reliability cronbaehs a was. Symonds 1924 implied that the optimal reliability is with a 7point scale. Pdf the effect of number of alternatives on validity and. Nevertheless, there is no definitive agreement on the number of response categories that optimizes the psychometric properties of the scales. Validity and reliability are necessary to ensure correct measurements of traits not directly observable psychological measurement is the process of measuring various psychological traits.
This validity basically refers to whether the factor structure of the questionnaire makes intuitive sense. Reliability is a very important factor in assessment, and is presented as an aspect contributing to validity and not opposed to validity. This scale is a 20 item selfreport inventory assessing symptoms of depression using a 4point likert scale. The statistical choice often depends on the design and purpose of the questionnaire. These scales offer an efficient method for capturing a wide range of variance in selfreported attitudes and behaviours. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales. The likert scale originated with rensis likert 21, and has a long history of use in kinesiology research , 14, 24. Likert type scales in relation to reliability and validity lei chang university of central florida reliability and validity of 4point and 6point scales were assessed using a new modelbased approach to fit empirical data. According to jacoby and matell 1971, validity need not be considered when determining the number of steps in a likert scale due to no consistent relationship with the number of scale steps utilize. Likerttype scales are increasingly being used among people with intellectual disability id.
Reliability was demonstrated by a cronbach alpha coefficient of 0. This is supported by lissits and green 1975 that likert scale reliability increased from 2 to 5. Scale development an initial pool of approximately 50 likerttype items was con. Reliability and validity of 4point and 6point scales were assessed using a new modelbased ap proach to fit empirical data. Examination of the reliability, validity, and scale structure. The reliability and validity study 210319 abstract to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine the social media smasf is a 5point likerttype scale consisting of 29 items 4 factors virtual tolerance, virtual communication, virtual problem and virtual information sample size. Instruments the zarit burden interview zbi is a 22item instrument for measuring the caregivers perceived burden of providing family care. Empirical evidence shows that nonlikert scale 0,1,2,3 is 92% reliable while the likerttype of scale had 90, 89, and 88% reliability. As an important theory to management, studies on testing the validity and reliability of the scale of selfconcept were limited. Validity test showed that nonlikert scale was 93% reliable. We shall briefly discuss here methods of estimating an instruments reliability. The cumberland ankle instability tool cait is a 9item scale used to assess impairments in individuals with a history of ankle sprain. Validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests. Effect of the number of response categories on the.
Chapter 7 scale reliability and validity research methods. A confirmatory factor analysis cfa was conducted in order to test the construct validity of the questionnaire. Some have claimed that reliability is independent of the number of scale points bendig, 1953. The present article reports the results of an independent investigation of the psychometric properties of the ors, specifically testretest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity with a nonclinical sample. Validity and reliability of the zarit burden interview in. Basic issues in objective scale development lee anna clark department of psychology the university of iowa david watson department of psychology the university of iowa abstract a primary goal of scale development is to create a valid measure of an underlying construct. All the items were phrased positively based on a 5point likert scale ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. Results low response rates were found among adolescents and adults with moderate to profound id. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the internal consistency, testretest reliability, interrater agreement, and criterionrelated validity of both the home and school versions of the. Simply put, a reliable measuring instrument is one which gives you the same measurements when you repeatedly measure the same unchanged objects or events. Efa of instruetional strategies scale of indicated a onefactor solution and this factor accounted for 57. The three underlying factors, interest, students readiness and learning style in the. Testretest reliability coefficients for the social, family and romantic subscales were.
Figure 1 shows a scatterplot of student response for the first administration of the statement and for the second administration of the statement 3 weeks later. The data to be presented represent an initial effort to provide reliability and vaudity information for such an affective scale. Subscale coefficients were good for the computer likert version 0. There are different statistical ways to measure the reliability and validity of your questionnaire. The process of validation involves accumulating evidence to provide a sound scientific basis for the. Face validity is a scales content logically appears to reflect what was intended to be measured. Likert scale, the non likert scale 0,1,2,3 may present a more logical alternative. Given the controversy surrounding different analyses and translations of the pbq, we hope that our findings will contribute significantly to the debate and will be of interest to those who perform research. Likert, and likerttype, responses are popular psychometric item scoring schemes for attempting to quantify peoples opinions on different issues. Testing criterion validity is beyond the scope of your project, but be aware of what it is and make sure you select s ensible items. Likert type scales are increasingly being used among people with intellectual disability id. However, the coefficients for the forced choice version ranged from 0. The problems involved in assessing the validity and reliability of such scores are several magnitudes more difficult than for. Methods fiftyone studies reporting response rates, response.
Messick 1989 transformed the traditional definition of validity with reliability in opposition to reliability becoming unified with validity. Reliability and validity testing of a new scale for measuring attitudes toward learnig statistics with techology 3 volume 4 number 1, 2011 a factor, must load to it more than 0. The study was carried out to know the effect of number of alternatives twothree five on alpha cronbach reliability coefficient and also on the validity in likert scale. Considering that the validity and reliability indexes of the questionnaire are reported in acceptable range, the new version of job satisfaction survey questionnaire i s a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring job sa tisfaction. Validity was further examined by investigating the correlation of the ipc loc scale with the rosenberg selfesteem scale rses and its association with several demographic and workrelated data. Background likerttype scales are increasingly being used among people with intellectual disability id. The testretest reliability coefficient for this statement was. These scales offer an efficient method for capturing a wide range of variance in self. The reliability introduction of a likert type scale is estimated with cronbach alpha coefficient cronbach, 1951. A likert scale assumes that the strengthintensity of an attitude is linear, i.
597 304 1498 302 249 304 898 1080 1121 1075 1112 1224 611 50 1062 437 530 1307 727 969 268 279 79 1448 891 609 636 831 596 1547 1049 1423 1150 1255 604 341 587 315 79 623 147 482 780 1472 205 1427